VirtualPee Review

Twelve performers are listed and each carries the same figure: one video, with an approval score between 78 and 84 per cent beside it. Nobody appears twice. Whether that is a casting principle or the shape of a small budget, it means the roster is the catalogue — you are choosing a person once and there is no going back to them.

Publishing a score against a performer rather than against a scene is itself unusual, and on a one-video roster the distinction collapses anyway: the rating of the woman and the rating of the work are the same number.

The niche is named without euphemism in the title, the description and the opening heading, and the scene names describe mechanics rather than scenarios. There is no pretence that this is anything other than what it says.

Pagination reaches fourteen pages against those twelve names, so the scene count runs well past the roster on display, and nothing reconciles the two. A production credit sits at the top of the page, downloads are offered in two qualities, and the compatible-headset list is given in full.